Industry trends
Benz to Bring Solid-State Battery EVs by 2030
William
Jul 25, 2025
Share2 Models
Hide Same Item
Highlight Different Item
Selected Specs
+ Add Models
General
Retail Price
RM 119,406
RM 579,888
Top Speed(km/h)
-
250
0-100km/h(s)
-
4.7
Manufacturers Claim(L/100km)
8.4
7.8
Launched Year
2016
2018
On Sale
X
X
Warranty Manufacturer
-
2 years / Unlimited
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Body
Segment
C-Segment
Sports Car
Length(mm)
4570
4133
Width(mm)
1760
1810
Height(mm)
1490
1301
Wheelbase(mm)
2635
2430
Weight(kg)
1310
1595
Doors
4
2
Seats
5
2
Fueltank(litres)
59
70
Boot Volume(L)
400
335
Engine
Capacity(cc)
1998
2996
Capacity(L)
2.0
3.0
Aspiration Form
NA
NA
Engine Power(PS)
150
372
Rpm at Max Hp(RPM)
6000 rpm
5500
Rpm at Max torque(RPM)
4200 rpm
2000
Number of Cylinders
4
6
Transmission
Number of gear
-
-
Transmission
CVT
AT
Chassis Steering
Driven Wheels
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Suspension
MacPherson Independent Suspension
Multi-link Independent Suspension
Rear Suspension
Multi-link Independent Suspension
Multi-link Independent Suspension
Wheel Braking
Front Brakes
Ventilated Disc
Ventilated Disc
Rear Brakes
-
Ventilated Disc
Parking Brake
-
Electric Parking Brake
Front Tyres
215 / 45R18
235 / 40R19
Rear Tyres
215 / 45R18
255 / 35R19
Spare Tyre
Space Saver
Not Full
Active Safety Features
ABS/EBD
●
●
Electronic Stability Control(ESC)
-
●
Seatbelt Reminder
-
-
Blind Spot Info System
-
-
Lane-keeping Alert
-
-
Autonomous Emergency Braking
-
●
Collision Warning
-
●
Passive Safety Features
Airbags
7
6
Driver Passenger Seat Airbags
●
●
Front Passenger Seat Airbags
●
●
Front Side Airbags
-
●
Front Curtain Airbags
-
●
Rear Curtain Airbags
-
●
knee_airbags
●
-
ISOFIX
●
-
Airbag Disable Function
-
●
Driver Assistance Features
Cruise Control
-
-
Parking Sensor Front
-
●
Parking Sensor Rear
●
●
Parking Camera
rear cameras
front and rear cameras
Auto Parking
-
-
Auto Start/Stop
-
●
Hill Start Assist
-
●
Interior Features
Multi-function Steering Wheel
●
●
Paddle Shift
●
●
Instrument Cluster
-
Electroluminescent Analogue
In-car/Out-car Power Supply
Power Socket
●
●
Anti-theft Features
Door Lock
Keyless Operation
Keyless Operation
Seat Features
Seat Features(Front-Driver)
Manual Adjustable
Power Adjustable Seats with Memory Function
Seat Features(Passenger)
Manual Adjustable
-
Seat Features(Rear)
60:40 Split Fold
-
Air Conditioning Features
Front Air-con
Single-zone Automatic Climate Control
Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control
Rear Air-con
-
-
Lighting Features
Headlamps
Halogen
LED
Taillamps
-
-
Daytime Running Lights
●
●
Auto Headlamps
●
●
Front Foglamps
●
-
Rear Foglamps
-
●
Interior Lighting
●
●
Glass/Rearview Mirror
Sunroof
●single sunroof
●single sunroof
Folding Wing Mirrors
●
●
Auto Wipers
●
●
Multimedia Features
Screen
6.1" Touchscreen
-
Speaker Brand
-
-
Speakers
-
-
Mitsubishi Lancer vs Mercedes-Benz AMG SLC Compare Review at PCauto
Debating between the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE or 2018 Mercedes-Benz SLC AMG AMG SLC 43? Our side-by-side comparison provides clarity. We examine cost, measurements, fuel usage, passenger room, configurations, and paint options to steer you toward the best fit.
2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE Snapshot
Starting at RM 119,406, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE arrived on 2016. Its Petrol engine sips just 8.4L/100km.
2018 Mercedes-Benz SLC AMG AMG SLC 43 Snapshot
Starting at RM 579,888, the 2018 Mercedes-Benz SLC AMG AMG SLC 43 arrived on 2018. Its Petrol engine sips just 7.8L/100km.
Too many choices? PCauto's car compare tool does the heavy lifting. Select your contenders, and we'll generate a thorough, easy-to-digest report.
Our analysis covers pricing, proportions, hues, interior volume, and efficiency, highlighting the distinctions among 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE and 2018 Mercedes-Benz SLC AMG AMG SLC 43. Instantly access specs, styling, and news—all to simplify your purchase and ensure satisfaction.
Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.
Mitsubishi Lancer vs Mercedes-Benz AMG SLC Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Lancer | Low fuel consumption for cost savingsGood handling with special chassis designFine interior workmanship and comfortable seatsAmple space for most passengersAffordable maintenance with mature engine tech | Underpowered with slow accelerationShort distance braking not idealCramped space for taller peopleOnly three stars in crash tests |
| Mercedes-Benz AMG SLC | High performance engine for thrilling driveStylish design catches everyone's eyeSuperior interior offers luxurious feelAdvanced tech ensures great driving aid | High maintenance cost over timeLimited cargo space for daily useFuel consumption may be relatively high |
Mitsubishi Lancer vs Mercedes-Benz AMG SLC Images
Mitsubishi Lancer More Information
Mercedes-Benz AMG SLC More Information
Popular Cars
Car Compare
Car Photos
Interior Photos