Ford photo

Ford Mustang 1965 Review

1965 Ford Mustang public, as the iconic classic Pony Car category, became an eternal Dream Car in the hearts of car enthusiasts with its dynamic and distinctive design, flexible power options, and affordable pricing.
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang photo
TBC
Ford Mustang 1965
Body Type
Coupe
Segment
-
Capacity(L)
-
Engine Power(PS)
-
Engine Torque(Nm)
-
Transmission
-
View Ford Mustang >
View Full Specs >
Review
User Review

As a classic car born in April 1964 and officially launched as the 1965 model, the Ford Mustang precisely targeted America’s post-war "youth consumer market" from its debut. At the time, young people were eager for an affordable, stylish, and practical sports car, and the arrival of the Mustang perfectly filled this niche market gap. Its key selling points were straightforward: iconic muscle car design language, flexible powertrain options, and an affordable pricing strategy. Even nearly 60 years later, these characteristics still make it the "Dream Car" in the hearts of classic car enthusiasts. This time, we got our hands on a 1965 Mustang Public version (Note: "Public" here is presumed to refer to the base production version, corresponding to the Standard model of the time). The main purpose is to reproduce its true performance as the "car for everyone" of its era and explore what made this car, which founded the "Pony Car" category, so wildly popular among consumers worldwide.

In terms of exterior design, the 1965 Mustang's design focused entirely on "dynamism" and "recognizability." The front features the then-popular long hood and short rear proportions. The two raised lines on the hood extend from the A-pillar to the front grille. Combined with the iconic "Fastback" or "Hardtop" body lines, it exudes a forward-leaning stance even when stationary. The front grille is its most iconic design: a rectangular chrome frame encases three horizontal chrome bars, with Ford's blue oval logo suspended in the center. Below is a body-colored front bumper, a combination that retains the refinement of American cars without appearing overly flashy. The side profile features a body crease line running from the front fender to the taillights, paired with 14-inch steel wheels (some models offered optional chrome wheels), further enhancing the muscular feel. The rear design is relatively simple, with vertically arranged round taillights on both sides. A chrome stripe connects the taillights and extends to the center of the trunk lid, while dual chrome exhaust pipes underneath hint at its performance characteristics. Notably, the Mustang offered more than 20 body color choices at the time, including the classic "Poison Ivy Green" and "Competition Orange," which was rare in the 1960s automobile market and made it easier to cater to various consumer tastes.

As for the interior, the 1965 Mustang followed a "practicality-first" approach but included some delightful details. The dashboard featured a layered design, with the upper layer made of black plastic and the lower layer covered in vinyl material matching the seat color. Although the texture was not as refined as modern cars, it was already considered "quality" for its time. For core features, it was equipped with an AM radio (FM available as an option), a manually adjustable air conditioning system (optional for the base version), and a three-spoke steering wheel. The steering wheel was made of black plastic, had a relatively large diameter, and felt sturdy to hold. Behind it was a mechanical pointer instrument cluster, displaying the tachometer, speedometer, fuel gauge, and water temperature gauge with clear and direct readings. The seats consisted of front bucket seats and rear bench seats. While the seat cushions were firm, they offered decent support and didn't cause significant discomfort during extended periods of sitting. Regarding space, its dimensions were 4610mm×1810mm×1320mm, with a wheelbase of 2740mm. Legroom in the front row was ample for passengers up to 180cm tall, while headroom was slightly compromised due to the fastback design but did not feel cramped. Rear legroom was relatively tight, making it more suitable for children or adults on shorter trips. In terms of storage, the trunk had a capacity of approximately 385 liters, sufficient for two 20-inch suitcases. Additionally, a storage box under the front seats could be used for small items, fully meeting the daily utility needs of family or couple outings.

Dynamic performance is one of the core competitive strengths of the 1965 Mustang. In terms of power, it offers three options: the base model comes with a 170-cubic-inch (2.8L) inline six-cylinder engine, delivering a maximum power of 101 horsepower and maximum torque of 225 Nm; the mid-range option features a 260-cubic-inch (4.3L) V8 engine with a maximum power of 164 horsepower and maximum torque of 353 Nm; the high-end model is equipped with a 289-cubic-inch (4.7L) V8 engine, producing a maximum power of 210 horsepower and maximum torque of 393 Nm. The version we test-drove is the 289 V8, paired with a 3-speed automatic transmission (a 4-speed manual is available as an option). During actual driving, throttle response during initial acceleration is not overly aggressive, but when the throttle is pressed deeply, the torque of the V8 engine bursts at around 2500 rpm, providing a significant push-back sensation. The 0-100 km/h acceleration time is around 7.5 seconds, which definitely qualified it as a "performance car" in the 1960s. When overtaking, pressing the throttle halfway will quickly cause the transmission to downshift, providing direct power output and sufficient confidence for high-speed overtaking. As for handling and suspension, the car uses a front MacPherson independent suspension and a rear solid axle non-independent suspension setup. The steering assist is mechanical, and while the steering feel is on the heavier side, it is precise without significant play. When handling bumpy roads, the rear suspension's shock absorption performance is average, as smaller bumps on the road are directly transmitted to the cabin. However, the vehicle doesn't sway significantly when encountering larger potholes. While cornering, the body roll is kept within acceptable limits, and the grip is commendable. As long as you're not pushing to the limit, stability is not an issue.

In terms of specific performance testing, we focused on fuel consumption: when driving in urban conditions (a mix of congestion and free-flowing traffic), the fuel consumption is about 15 liters per 100 kilometers; on highways (at an average speed of 100 km/h), the fuel consumption is about 12 liters per 100 kilometers. For a 4.7L V8 engine, this was considered normal at the time. Regarding braking performance, it comes equipped with front disc and rear drum brakes. The brake pedal travel is relatively long; initial braking force is soft, but pressing harder provides progressively linear braking power. The braking distance from 100 km/h to 0 is approximately 45 meters, meeting the safety standards of the 1960s. In terms of driving comfort, noise control is its shortcoming—while driving at high speeds, engine noise and wind noise are quite noticeable inside the cabin. However, for classic car enthusiasts, this “V8 roar” is more of a delight than a flaw. The seats provide good support, and prolonged driving won’t cause back pain. Additionally, the clutch (manual version) has a long travel with a clear engagement point, making it easy for beginners to adapt.

To summarize, the core highlights of the 1965 Ford Mustang are very prominent: the iconic muscle car design, flexible powertrain options, accessible pricing (with a starting price of around $2,368 at the time, significantly lower than the Chevrolet Camaro of the same period), and good practicality. Compared to competitors in the same class (such as the Pontiac Firebird), its advantage lies in its "balance"—it combines the dynamics of a sports car with the practicality of a daily driver. Additionally, it has great potential for aftermarket modifications, which is one of the reasons for its enduring popularity. Overall, this car is suitable for two types of people: first, classic car enthusiasts who value the Mustang’s historical significance and collectible value; second, younger individuals pursuing a sense of "retro style" who want a vehicle that can serve as a daily driver while also turning heads on weekends. Even today, the 1965 Mustang remains a model that doesn’t "compromise"—while it lacks the technological features of modern cars, its mechanical charm, V8 roar, and iconic design are precisely the "soul" that modern cars tend to lack. For lovers of classic cars, it is absolutely worth owning.

Pros
Vintage leather seats boast excellent texture, providing comfortable seating with a nostalgic atmosphere
V8 engine delivers a rich and powerful roar, effectively alleviating driving fatigue
The fastback design stands out with its retro appearance, attracting attention and achieving high turning heads
Cons
The wiper speed is too slow, leading to blurred front windows on rainy days, which affects visibility.
Lack of modern electronic assistance systems, resulting in somewhat compromised driving safety.
Leather seats overheat after exposure to sunlight in summer, affecting seating comfort.
Overall Rating
4.4
Excellent
From 6 Reviews
Section Rating
Performance
4.8 / 5
Interior Design
4.3 / 5
Safety
4.2 / 5
Exterior Design
4.3 / 5
Showing 6 reviews
5 Excellent
MalayAuto10
Owner of 1965 Ford Mustang public
The interior is absolutely amazing! The retro leather seats feel incredibly textured, and sitting inside feels like being wrapped in old times~
5 Excellent
ViosXP
Owner of 1965 Ford Mustang public
Last Wednesday after work, I encountered a thunderstorm and was driving my '65 Mustang up a mountain road on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur. The V8 roar of this old buddy in the rainy fog was absolutely thrilling, and its retro fastback design even caught the attention of motorcyclists seeking shelter from the rain—giving it a 4 out of 5 for appearance is well-deserved. But while climbing the slope, the wipers were as slow as a snail, and the windshield quickly became blurry. I quickly gripped the steering wheel and hit the brakes. Thankfully, the body and chassis were stable enough to prevent skidding. As for safety, I’d give it 4 out of 5, with the deducted point entirely due to the slow wipers and lack of modern electronic aids.
5 Excellent
JohorDriver
Owner of 1965 Ford Mustang public
The moment I stepped on the accelerator for the first time, I was pulled into the old days, it felt amazing!
4 Excellent
PetrolHead
Owner of 1965 Ford Mustang public
Every day, driving this old beast through the crowded streets, although occasionally frustrated by traffic jams, just stepping on the accelerator instantly washes away all the fatigue with its robust roar. The only minor regret is that in summer, after parking, the seats get so hot they could fry an egg. But for this sentiment, it's worth it!
5 Excellent
H2_998
Owner of 1965 Ford Mustang public
Driving this '65 Mustang out every day, the roar of the classic engine is more thrilling than any song! The seats might burn your butt under the afternoon sun, but seeing its shiny body turn heads on the street – this little trouble is nothing~
1
2
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang
Infiniti Q60 photo
Infiniti Q60
Ford Mustang
vs
Infiniti Q60
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang
Toyota GR86 photo
Toyota GR86
Ford Mustang
vs
Toyota GR86
Ford Mustang photo
Ford Mustang
BMW Z4 photo
BMW Z4
Ford Mustang
vs
BMW Z4

How to use a 2018 Mustang remote start?

How wide is a 2018 Mustang?

What is the fuel consumption of a 2018 Mustang?