Porsche Macan vs Rolls Royce Rolls-Royce Cullinan, which is the best?

General

Retail Price

RM 786,232

RM 1,800,000

Top Speed(km/h)

272

0-100km/h(s)

4.3

Manufacturers Claim(L/100km)

11.3

15.1

Launched Year

2022

2018

On Sale

√

Warranty Manufacturer

Fuel Type

Petrol

Body

Segment

Luxury

Length(mm)

4726

5341

Width(mm)

1922

2165

Height(mm)

1621

1835

Wheelbase(mm)

2807

3295

Doors

Seats

Boot Volume(L)

560

Engine

Capacity(cc)

2900

6755

Capacity(L)

2.9

6.8

Aspiration Form

Turbo

Engine Power(PS)

440

571

Number of Cylinders

Transmission

Number of gear

Transmission

DCT

Chassis Steering

Driven Wheels

All Wheel Drive

Front Suspension

Rear Suspension

Wheel Braking

Front Brakes

Rear Brakes

Parking Brake

Manual

Front Tyres

Rear Tyres

Spare Tyre

Active Safety Features

ABS/EBD

●

Electronic Stability Control(ESC)

●

Seatbelt Reminder

Blind Spot Info System

Lane-keeping Alert

Autonomous Emergency Braking

●

Collision Warning

Passive Safety Features

Airbags

Driver Passenger Seat Airbags

●

Front Passenger Seat Airbags

●

Front Side Airbags

●

ISOFIX

Driver Assistance Features

Cruise Control

Parking Sensor Rear

Parking Camera

Auto Parking

Auto Start/Stop

●

Hill Start Assist

Interior Features

Multi-function Steering Wheel

●

Paddle Shift

In-car/Out-car Power Supply

Power Socket

Anti-theft Features

Door Lock

Keyless Operation

Air Conditioning Features

Front Air-con

Rear Air-con

Lighting Features

Headlamps

Taillamps

Daytime Running Lights

Auto Headlamps

●

Front Foglamps

Rear Foglamps

Interior Lighting

Multimedia Features

Speaker Brand

Speakers

Car Compare

Porsche Macan

Porsche Macan EV

Porsche Macan vs Porsche Macan EV

Porsche Macan

Porsche Cayenne

Porsche Macan vs Porsche Cayenne

Porsche Macan

Maserati Levante

Porsche Macan vs Maserati Levante

Porsche Macan vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan Compare Review at PCauto

2022 Porsche Macan GTS or 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Cullinan, which one suits you best? PCauto car comparison tool delivers the answers. We scrutinize specs, size, price, seating space, equipment, and color selections to pinpoint your perfect vehicle. 2022 Porsche Macan GTS Key Details Priced from RM 786,232, the 2022 Porsche Macan GTS released on 2022. Its Petrol engine manages a thrifty 11.3L/100km. 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Cullinan Key Details Priced from RM 1,800,000, the 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Cullinan released on 2018. Its Petrol engine manages a thrifty 15.1L/100km. Indecisive? PCauto's car compare tool eliminates guesswork. Check your preferred models, and we'll furnish a meticulous, unbiased evaluation. We weigh vital elements like cost, footprint, palette, accommodations, and consumption, clarifying how 2022 Porsche Macan GTS and 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Cullinan compare. Tap once for specs, aesthetics, and updates, your shortcut to a savvy, stress-free purchase.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Porsche Macan vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Porsche Macan	Luxurious interiorTop-notch performanceStable controlThe exterior design is tasteful, the turbocharged four-cylinder engine is powerful, the turbocharged six-cylinder engine is exciting, and the chassis tuning is excellent	Styling is subjectiveDriving height is limitedThe interior space is limited, the trunk and rear passenger space are tight, the infotainment system appears outdated, the standard interior materials do not match the price
Rolls-Royce Cullinan	Ultra-luxurious interior with top-quality materialsPowerful 6.75-litre V12 engine for strong performanceExcellent off-road ability with advanced 4WD systemMagic carpet ride experience via air suspensionHigh level of customization to meet unique needs	High fuel consumption due to large engineBulky size may be hard to park in tight spacesHigh price and costly maintenanceRear doors can be difficult to open/close on slopesTires not optimal for extreme off-road driving