Proton Saga vs Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Proton Saga vs Mitsubishi Lancer Compare Review at PCauto

Struggling to decide between the 2025 Proton Saga 1.5 Premium CVT or 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE? Our detailed comparison makes your choice easier. We analyze pricing, dimensions, fuel efficiency, interior space, features, and color options side-by-side, helping you identify the perfect match for your requirements. 2025 Proton Saga 1.5 Premium CVT Overview Priced from RM 48,990, the 2025 Proton Saga 1.5 Premium CVT was released on 2025-11-27. Its Petrol engine delivers outstanding efficiency, as low as 6.7L/100km. 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE Overview Priced from RM 119,406, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE was released on 2016. Its Petrol engine delivers outstanding efficiency, as low as 8.4L/100km. Choosing the right car can be overwhelming, but PCauto's car compare tool simplifies the process. Select your preferred models from our database, and we'll provide a detailed breakdown of their strengths and differences. Our tool evaluates critical factors like cost, size, color choices, cabin comfort, and fuel economy, giving you a clear picture of how 2025 Proton Saga 1.5 Premium CVT and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE stack up. With just a click, access in-depth comparisons of specs, styling, and the latest updates—all designed to help you make an informed decision and enjoy a hassle-free car-buying experience.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Proton Saga vs Mitsubishi Lancer Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Proton Saga	The price of the car is affordable, the size is large, the overall length and width of the exterior have a sense of overstepping the level, the interior space is spacious, and the leg and knee space in the back row is outstandingThe ride is comfortable, the suspension is soft, and long-distance driving is also comfortable	The appearance does not conform to the current trend, a low-lying posture is dynamic, but the overall contour is square and old-fashioned, lacking appeal to the younger generationThe interior decoration is outdated, the dashboard is out of date, like the style of two or three decades agoAt this price, it lacks some comfort and convenience configurations that modern buyers take for granted, such as no suitable touch screen sound system
Mitsubishi Lancer	Low fuel consumption for cost savingsGood handling with special chassis designFine interior workmanship and comfortable seatsAmple space for most passengersAffordable maintenance with mature engine tech	Underpowered with slow accelerationShort distance braking not idealCramped space for taller peopleOnly three stars in crash tests