Explore Mitsubishi Destinator vs Ford Ecosport for the Best Choice

General

Retail Price

TBC

RM 98,120

Manufacturers Claim(L/100km)

6.5

Launched Year

2025

2019

On Sale

Warranty Manufacturer

Fuel Type

Petrol

Body

Segment

D-Segment

B-Segment

Length(mm)

4680

4273

Width(mm)

1840

1765

Height(mm)

1780

1675

Wheelbase(mm)

2815

2519

Weight(kg)

1495

Doors

Seats

Fueltank(litres)

Engine

Capacity(cc)

1499

Capacity(L)

1.5

Aspiration Form

Turbo

Engine Power(PS)

163

110

Engine Power(kW)

120

Rpm at Max Hp(RPM)

5000

6300

Engine Torque(Nm)

250

Rpm at Max torque(RPM)

2500-4000

4400

Cylinder Arrangement

Inline(L)

Number of Cylinders

Transmission

Number of gear

Transmission

CVT

Chassis Steering

Driven Wheels

Front Wheel Drive

Front Suspension

MacPherson Independent Suspension

Rear Suspension

Torsion Beam Independent Suspension

Wheel Braking

Front Brakes

Ventilated Disc

Rear Brakes

Ventilated Disc

Parking Brake

Electric Parking Brake

Front Tyres

225 / 55 R18

205 / 60 R16

Rear Tyres

225 / 55 R18

205 / 60 R16

Spare Tyre

Off-road Performance

Ground Clearance

200

Active Safety Features

ABS/EBD

●

Electronic Stability Control(ESC)

Seatbelt Reminder

YES

Blind Spot Info System

●

Lane-keeping Alert

Autonomous Emergency Braking

●

Collision Warning

●

Passive Safety Features

Airbags

Driver Passenger Seat Airbags

●

Front Passenger Seat Airbags

●

Front Side Airbags

●

Rear Side Airbags

●

Front Curtain Airbags

●

Rear Curtain Airbags

●

knee_airbags

●

ISOFIX

●

Driver Assistance Features

Cruise Control

ACC

Parking Sensor Rear

Parking Camera

360-degree

Auto Parking

Auto Start/Stop

Hill Start Assist

Interior Features

Adjustable Steering Wheels

Manual

Multi-function Steering Wheel

●

Paddle Shift

Instrument Cluster

8-inch instrument screen

In-car/Out-car Power Supply

Power Socket

Anti-theft Features

Door Lock

Keyless Operation

Air Conditioning Features

Front Air-con

Auto

Rear Air-con

●

Lighting Features

Headlamps

LED

Taillamps

LED

Daytime Running Lights

●

Auto Headlamps

●

Front Foglamps

Rear Foglamps

●

Interior Lighting

●

Glass/Rearview Mirror

Sunroof

●fixed panoramic sunroof

Auto Wipers

●

Multimedia Features

Screen

12.3-inch infotainment touchscreen

Screen Size(inch)

12.3

Speaker Brand

Speakers

Car Compare

Mitsubishi Destinator

Proton X90

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Proton X90

Mitsubishi Destinator

Proton e.Mas 7

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Proton e.Mas 7

Mitsubishi Destinator

Jetour VT 9

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Jetour VT 9

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Ford Ecosport Compare Review at PCauto

Torn between the 2025 Mitsubishi Destinator and 2019 Ford EcoSport 1.5 Titanium? PCauto car comparison tool is your decision-making ally. We evaluate sticker prices, proportions, fuel thrift, passenger area, amenities, and finishes to reveal your optimal match. 2025 Mitsubishi Destinator At a Glance The 2025 Mitsubishi Destinator carries a TBC starting tag and bowed on 2025. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious -L/100km. 2019 Ford EcoSport 1.5 Titanium At a Glance The 2019 Ford EcoSport 1.5 Titanium carries a RM 98,120 starting tag and bowed on 2019. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 6.5L/100km. Overwhelmed? PCauto's car compare tool brings order to chaos. Highlight your candidates, and we'll supply a rigorous, illuminating appraisal. Our system contrasts pivotal traits like expense, scale, shades, spaciousness, and sip rates to expose the gaps between 2025 Mitsubishi Destinator and 2019 Ford EcoSport 1.5 Titanium. Click once for dimensions, designs, and developments. Everything you need to drive away delighted.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Ford Ecosport Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Ford Ecosport	Unique and attractive designExcellent safety performanceStandard all-wheel drive, small size with high flexibility, superior traction than most competitors	Its power is not the strongest in the same price rangeFuel efficiency is not highRear seat space is narrow, there are issues with interior and driving quality