Industry trends
Mitsubishi Cuts Full-Year Profit Forecast by 30%, Challenged by US Tariffs and Intensified Global Competition
Kevin Wong
Aug 28, 2025
Share2 Models
Hide Same Item
Highlight Different Item
Selected Specs
+ Add Models
General
Retail Price
RM 94,486
RM 119,406
Manufacturers Claim(L/100km)
8.1
8.4
Launched Year
-
2016
On Sale
X
X
Warranty Manufacturer
-
-
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Body
Segment
-
C-Segment
Length(mm)
-
4570
Width(mm)
-
1760
Height(mm)
-
1490
Wheelbase(mm)
-
2635
Weight(kg)
-
1310
Doors
-
4
Seats
-
5
Fueltank(litres)
-
59
Boot Volume(L)
-
400
Engine
Capacity(cc)
-
1998
Capacity(L)
-
2.0
Aspiration Form
-
NA
Engine Power(PS)
-
150
Rpm at Max Hp(RPM)
-
6000 rpm
Rpm at Max torque(RPM)
-
4200 rpm
Number of Cylinders
-
4
Transmission
Number of gear
-
-
Transmission
-
CVT
Chassis Steering
Driven Wheels
-
Front Wheel Drive
Front Suspension
-
MacPherson Independent Suspension
Rear Suspension
-
Multi-link Independent Suspension
Wheel Braking
Front Brakes
-
Ventilated Disc
Rear Brakes
-
-
Parking Brake
-
-
Front Tyres
-
215 / 45R18
Rear Tyres
-
215 / 45R18
Spare Tyre
-
Space Saver
Active Safety Features
ABS/EBD
-
●
Electronic Stability Control(ESC)
-
-
Seatbelt Reminder
-
-
Blind Spot Info System
-
-
Lane-keeping Alert
-
-
Autonomous Emergency Braking
-
-
Collision Warning
-
-
Passive Safety Features
Airbags
-
7
Driver Passenger Seat Airbags
-
●
Front Passenger Seat Airbags
-
●
knee_airbags
-
●
ISOFIX
-
●
Driver Assistance Features
Cruise Control
-
-
Parking Sensor Rear
-
●
Parking Camera
-
rear cameras
Auto Parking
-
-
Auto Start/Stop
-
-
Hill Start Assist
-
-
Interior Features
Multi-function Steering Wheel
-
●
Paddle Shift
-
●
In-car/Out-car Power Supply
Power Socket
-
●
Anti-theft Features
Door Lock
-
Keyless Operation
Seat Features
Seat Features(Front-Driver)
-
Manual Adjustable
Seat Features(Passenger)
-
Manual Adjustable
Seat Features(Rear)
-
60:40 Split Fold
Air Conditioning Features
Front Air-con
-
Single-zone Automatic Climate Control
Rear Air-con
-
-
Lighting Features
Headlamps
-
Halogen
Taillamps
-
-
Daytime Running Lights
-
●
Auto Headlamps
-
●
Front Foglamps
-
●
Rear Foglamps
-
-
Interior Lighting
-
●
Glass/Rearview Mirror
Sunroof
-
●single sunroof
Folding Wing Mirrors
-
●
Auto Wipers
-
●
Multimedia Features
Screen
-
6.1" Touchscreen
Speaker Brand
-
-
Speakers
-
-
Car Compare
Chevrolet Sonic
Proton Iriz
Chevrolet Sonic
Perodua Myvi
Chevrolet Sonic
Ford Fiesta
Chevrolet Sonic vs Mitsubishi Lancer Compare Review at PCauto
Torn between the 2014 Chevrolet Sonic Hatchback and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE? PCauto car comparison tool is your decision-making ally. We evaluate sticker prices, proportions, fuel thrift, passenger area, amenities, and finishes to reveal your optimal match.
2014 Chevrolet Sonic Hatchback At a Glance
The 2014 Chevrolet Sonic Hatchback carries a RM 94,486 starting tag and bowed on -. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 8.1L/100km.
2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE At a Glance
The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE carries a RM 119,406 starting tag and bowed on 2016. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 8.4L/100km.
Overwhelmed? PCauto's car compare tool brings order to chaos. Highlight your candidates, and we'll supply a rigorous, illuminating appraisal.
Our system contrasts pivotal traits like expense, scale, shades, spaciousness, and sip rates to expose the gaps between 2014 Chevrolet Sonic Hatchback and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 GTE. Click once for dimensions, designs, and developments. Everything you need to drive away delighted.
Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.
Chevrolet Sonic vs Mitsubishi Lancer Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Sonic | Powerful turbocharged engineStandard 4G LTE Wi-Fi connectionDecent storage space | More expensive than major competitorsPoor fuel efficiencyLimited driver assistance features |
| Mitsubishi Lancer | Low fuel consumption for cost savingsGood handling with special chassis designFine interior workmanship and comfortable seatsAmple space for most passengersAffordable maintenance with mature engine tech | Underpowered with slow accelerationShort distance braking not idealCramped space for taller peopleOnly three stars in crash tests |
Chevrolet Sonic vs Mitsubishi Lancer Images
Chevrolet Sonic More Information
Mitsubishi Lancer More Information
Popular Cars
Car Compare
Car Photos
Interior Photos
Model Year
car model