Article
Which years of Mazda CX-9 should not be purchased? What problems might occur?
Kevin Wong
Mar 24, 2026
Share2 Models
Hide Same Item
Highlight Different Item
Selected Specs
+ Add Models
General
Retail Price
RM 565,800
RM 143,218
Top Speed(km/h)
230
-
0-100km/h(s)
7.6
-
Manufacturers Claim(L/100km)
9.4
7.7
Launched Year
2024
2021
On Sale
√
√
Warranty Manufacturer
5 years / 150,000 km
5 years / 100,000 km
Fuel Type
Petrol
Diesel
Body
Segment
D-Segment
4x4
Length(mm)
4371
5280
Width(mm)
2100
1870
Height(mm)
1649
1810
Wheelbase(mm)
2681
3125
Weight(kg)
2430
2010
Doors
5
4
Seats
5
5
Fueltank(litres)
67
76
Boot Volume(L)
410
-
Engine
Capacity(cc)
1997
2999
Capacity(L)
2.0
3.0
Aspiration Form
Turbo
Turbo
Engine Power(PS)
249
190
Rpm at Max Hp(RPM)
5500
3600
Engine Torque(Nm)
365
-
Rpm at Max torque(RPM)
1300-4500
1600
Number of Cylinders
4
4
Transmission
Number of gear
-
-
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis Steering
Driven Wheels
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Front Suspension
MacPherson Independent Suspension
Double Wishbone Independent Suspension
Rear Suspension
Multi-link Independent Suspension
-
Wheel Braking
Front Brakes
Lightweight discs
Ventilated Disc
Rear Brakes
Lightweight discs
-
Parking Brake
Electric Parking Brake
Manual
Front Tyres
245 / 45 R20
265 / 60 R18
Rear Tyres
245 / 45 R20
265 / 60 R18
Spare Tyre
-
-
Active Safety Features
ABS/EBD
●
●
Electronic Stability Control(ESC)
●
●
Seatbelt Reminder
YES
-
Blind Spot Info System
●
●
Lane-keeping Alert
●
●
Autonomous Emergency Braking
●
●
Collision Warning
●
●
Passive Safety Features
Airbags
6
7
Driver Passenger Seat Airbags
●
●
Front Passenger Seat Airbags
●
●
Front Side Airbags
-
●
Front Curtain Airbags
●
●
Rear Curtain Airbags
-
●
knee_airbags
●
●
ISOFIX
●
●
Airbag Disable Function
●
●
Driver Assistance Features
Cruise Control
ACC
-
Parking Sensor Front
●
●
Parking Sensor Rear
●
●
Parking Camera
360-degree
rear cameras
Auto Parking
●
-
Auto Start/Stop
-
●
Hill Start Assist
●
●
Interior Features
Adjustable Steering Wheels
Manual
-
Multi-function Steering Wheel
●
●
Paddle Shift
●
-
Head-up Display
●
-
Instrument Cluster
Full LCD instrument panel
Electroluminescent Analogue
In-car/Out-car Power Supply
Power Socket
●
●
Anti-theft Features
Door Lock
Keyless Operation
Keyless Operation
Seat Features
Seat Features(Front-Driver)
8-Way Power Adjustable with Memory Function
8-way Power Adjustable
Seat Features(Passenger)
8-Way Power Adjustable Seat
8-way Power Adjustable
Seat Features(Rear)
60:40 Split-Folding
60:40 Tip-up Base with Centre Armrest
Air Conditioning Features
Front Air-con
2-zone Automatic Climate Control
Dual-zone Automatic Climate Control
Rear Air-con
●
●
Lighting Features
Headlamps
LED
Xenon
Halogen
LED
Taillamps
-
-
Daytime Running Lights
●
●
Auto Headlamps
●
●
Front Foglamps
●
●
Rear Foglamps
●
●
Interior Lighting
●
●
Glass/Rearview Mirror
Folding Wing Mirrors
●
●
Auto Wipers
●
●
Multimedia Features
Screen
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
Screen Size(inch)
11.4
9
Speaker Brand
Meridian
-
Sound Plus Functions
●
●
Speakers
11
8 Speakers
Car Compare
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Proton X90
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Proton e.Mas 7
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Jetour VT 9
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Mazda BT-50 Compare Review at PCauto
If you are unsure whether to purchase the 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P250 Dynamic HSE or 2022 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab 3.0 High Plus, this detailed comparison will assist you in making the right decision. We provide a thorough evaluation of price, dimensions, fuel consumption, cabin space, configurations, and colour options, guiding you to find the vehicle that best meets your needs.
2024 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P250 Dynamic HSE Compare Review
The 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P250 Dynamic HSE has a starting price of RM 565,800, and the launch date is 2024. It runs on Petrol, and the lowest fuel consumption is 9.4L/100km.
2022 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab 3.0 High Plus Compare Review
The 2022 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab 3.0 High Plus has a starting price of RM 143,218, and the launch date is 2021. It runs on Diesel, and the lowest fuel consumption is 7.7L/100km.
It is common to feel uncertain when faced with numerous car options. However, with PCauto's comprehensive car comparison tool, you can easily identify the ideal model that fits your needs. Simply select the models that interest you from our extensive list, and let us handle the detailed analysis.
Our car comparison tool evaluates a wide range of key metrics, including price, dimensions, colours, cabin space, fuel consumption, etc., offering a complete understanding of the differences between 2024 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P250 Dynamic HSE, 2022 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab 3.0 High Plus. With just one click, PCauto's car comparison tool provides an in-depth comparison of each model's specifications, exterior design, and interior features, as well as the latest updates. Our purpose is not only to assist you in comparing prices and specifications, but also to guide you in selecting the ideal vehicle, making your car-buying journey smoother and more efficient.
Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Mazda BT-50 Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Stylish and unique exterior designLuxurious interior with high-quality materialsAdvanced tech features like large touchscreenMultiple efficient and eco-friendly powertrainsDecent cabin storage for daily useGood handling and driving dynamicsExcellent L2 autodrive for highway driving | Slow mirror heating in wet weatherUnusual and inconsistent braking feelRoom for improvement in autonomous drivingSlow auto door opening and closing issuesLimited storage space in the cabinSomewhat complex and buggy infotainmentUnreasonable button layout in the car |
| Mazda BT-50 | Strong towing capacity up to 3,500kgComfortable ride with well-tuned suspensionFuel-efficient diesel engines for long drivesNewer models have updated tech and infotainmentAggressive and distinct exterior design | Limited off-road prowess compared to some rivalsHigher trim levels may be relatively priceyRear legroom could be tight for tall passengersSome users find the infotainment system a bit complex |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Mazda BT-50 Images
Mazda BT-50 Images and Colours
View More >
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque More Information
Mazda BT-50 More Information
Popular Cars
Model Year
Car Compare
Car Photo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Images and Colours
View More >