BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-3 Compare Review at PCauto

Torn between the 2025 BMW X3 20 xDrive M Sport and 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High? PCauto car comparison tool is your decision-making ally. We evaluate sticker prices, proportions, fuel thrift, passenger area, amenities, and finishes to reveal your optimal match. 2025 BMW X3 20 xDrive M Sport At a Glance The 2025 BMW X3 20 xDrive M Sport carries a RM 320,800 starting tag and bowed on 2025-6-12. Its Petrol Hybrid(HEV,MHEV) propulsion nets a parsimonious 7.5L/100km. 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High At a Glance The 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High carries a RM 139,159 starting tag and bowed on 2023. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 6.3L/100km. Overwhelmed? PCauto's car compare tool brings order to chaos. Highlight your candidates, and we'll supply a rigorous, illuminating appraisal. Our system contrasts pivotal traits like expense, scale, shades, spaciousness, and sip rates to expose the gaps between 2025 BMW X3 20 xDrive M Sport and 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High. Click once for dimensions, designs, and developments. Everything you need to drive away delighted.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-3 Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
BMW X3	Offering a choice of gasoline and hybrid power systemsUpdated design with unique lighting elementsInterior upgrades, equipped with advanced information and entertainment functionsIncludes safety-focused driver assistance systemsCompetitive pricing at different configuration levels	Personal preference for color selection is limited.
Mazda CX-3	Attractive exterior with full LED headlights, wide front grille and smooth side contoursExcellent assembly and craftsmanship, offering a premium feelRich safety configurations, such as six airbags and a variety of safety systemsLively driving dynamics, fuel-efficient power system, and playful exterior	The interior design is not attractive, the dashboard and center console are simpleDue to the curve design, the practical cabin space is smaller, and there is not enough space for the head and shouldersAs an SUV, the sitting position is lower and the ground clearance is smallerThe rear seat and cargo space are tight, the four-cylinder engine is not refined enough, and the driving experience is hard