Nissan Kicks vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Nissan Kicks vs Mazda CX-3 Compare Review at PCauto

Debating between the 2025 Nissan Kicks public or 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High? Our side-by-side comparison provides clarity. We examine cost, measurements, fuel usage, passenger room, configurations, and paint options to steer you toward the best fit. 2025 Nissan Kicks public Snapshot Starting at TBC, the 2025 Nissan Kicks public arrived on -. Its - engine sips just -L/100km. 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High Snapshot Starting at RM 139,159, the 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High arrived on 2023. Its Petrol engine sips just 6.3L/100km. Too many choices? PCauto's car compare tool does the heavy lifting. Select your contenders, and we'll generate a thorough, easy-to-digest report. Our analysis covers pricing, proportions, hues, interior volume, and efficiency, highlighting the distinctions among 2025 Nissan Kicks public and 2023 Mazda CX-3 2.0 High. Instantly access specs, styling, and news—all to simplify your purchase and ensure satisfaction.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Nissan Kicks vs Mazda CX-3 Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Nissan Kicks	Excellent exterior and interior designReasonably priced with rich configurationsGood fuel economy	The driving texture is slightly roughThe power system needs to be improvedThe screen position is low, some touch controls are weird
Mazda CX-3	Attractive exterior with full LED headlights, wide front grille and smooth side contoursExcellent assembly and craftsmanship, offering a premium feelRich safety configurations, such as six airbags and a variety of safety systemsLively driving dynamics, fuel-efficient power system, and playful exterior	The interior design is not attractive, the dashboard and center console are simpleDue to the curve design, the practical cabin space is smaller, and there is not enough space for the head and shouldersAs an SUV, the sitting position is lower and the ground clearance is smallerThe rear seat and cargo space are tight, the four-cylinder engine is not refined enough, and the driving experience is hard