Proton Satria vs Proton Iriz Comparison

Proton Satria vs Proton Iriz Compare Review at PCauto

Torn between the 2015 Proton Satria Neo R3 AT and 2023 Proton Iriz 1.6 Active CVT? PCauto car comparison tool is your decision-making ally. We evaluate sticker prices, proportions, fuel thrift, passenger area, amenities, and finishes to reveal your optimal match. 2015 Proton Satria Neo R3 AT At a Glance The 2015 Proton Satria Neo R3 AT carries a RM 60,648 starting tag and bowed on 2015. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 6.1L/100km. 2023 Proton Iriz 1.6 Active CVT At a Glance The 2023 Proton Iriz 1.6 Active CVT carries a RM 57,300 starting tag and bowed on 2023. Its Petrol propulsion nets a parsimonious 7.4L/100km. Overwhelmed? PCauto's car compare tool brings order to chaos. Highlight your candidates, and we'll supply a rigorous, illuminating appraisal. Our system contrasts pivotal traits like expense, scale, shades, spaciousness, and sip rates to expose the gaps between 2015 Proton Satria Neo R3 AT and 2023 Proton Iriz 1.6 Active CVT. Click once for dimensions, designs, and developments. Everything you need to drive away delighted.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Proton Satria vs Proton Iriz Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Proton Satria	Offers affordable pricing for budget-conscious buyers.Known for decent durability and reliability.Spare parts availability is relatively good.	Interior quality may not match some rival brands.Fuel efficiency might not be the best in its class.Limited high-tech features compared to newer models.
Proton Iriz	Unique and fashionable appearance, especially the front and rear partsOutstanding safety configuration, equipped with six airbags, ABS and EBD, traction control, vehicle stability control, front and rear parking sensors1.3 liter and 1.6 liter gasoline engines are powerful, especially the 1.6 liter engine is full of power	The interior design is plain, the overall design of the dashboard is ordinary, and without a touch screen information entertainment system, it would seem outdatedThe compact size affects the comfort of the rear seats, the rear space is insufficient, it is difficult to accommodate three adults, and there is insufficient support under the thighs