Mazda Biante vs Perodua Bezza Comparison

Mazda Biante vs Perodua Bezza Compare Review at PCauto

Debating between the 2017 Mazda Biante 2.0 SkyActiv-G or 2023 Perodua Bezza 1.3 AV (A)? Our side-by-side comparison provides clarity. We examine cost, measurements, fuel usage, passenger room, configurations, and paint options to steer you toward the best fit. 2017 Mazda Biante 2.0 SkyActiv-G Snapshot Starting at RM 140,514, the 2017 Mazda Biante 2.0 SkyActiv-G arrived on 2017. Its Petrol engine sips just 7.4L/100km. 2023 Perodua Bezza 1.3 AV (A) Snapshot Starting at RM 49,980, the 2023 Perodua Bezza 1.3 AV (A) arrived on 2023. Its Petrol engine sips just 4.5L/100km. Too many choices? PCauto's car compare tool does the heavy lifting. Select your contenders, and we'll generate a thorough, easy-to-digest report. Our analysis covers pricing, proportions, hues, interior volume, and efficiency, highlighting the distinctions among 2017 Mazda Biante 2.0 SkyActiv-G and 2023 Perodua Bezza 1.3 AV (A). Instantly access specs, styling, and news—all to simplify your purchase and ensure satisfaction.

Warm reminder: The above data is for reference only. The model configuration shall be subject to the actual vehicle. If there is any change, the right of interpretation belongs to the manufacturer.

Mazda Biante vs Perodua Bezza Pros & Cons

	Pros	Cons
Mazda Biante	Excellent handling for enjoyable drivingAdvanced engine with good fuel economyHigh-quality interior for comfortDistinctive design stands out on roadReliable safety systems for protection	Limited rear space may cause discomfortHigh noise levels at high speedsLower resale value than some rivalsHigher maintenance costs over timeFewer powertrain options available
Perodua Bezza	The space is outstanding, comparable to a high-level sedan, the back row is spacious, with ample leg, knee and shoulder space, and the trunk space is the best in its classOffers a choice of 1.0 and 1.3 liter petrol engines, excellent fuel efficiency, manual and automatic models exceed 21kmpl in fuel economy, leading in its classThe driving experience is convenient, with a small turning radius, coupled with soft steering and suspension settings, making it easy to handle daily traffic	The engine is small, the performance output is a bit low, lacking driving pleasure, quite dullThe overall appearance is bland, and although the interior is equipped with comfortable and convenient features, it's not modern enough and not as satisfying as cars in the same class